Does it Pay to be Mean?

Update: On this Good Friday, I’m repeating this blog entry originally posted on December 16, 2011, written the day after ranting a bit about Dennis Gartman and receiving more hits than for any previous blog. Fast forward 4 months and history repeated itself in terms of hits when I carried on about Rakesh Agrawal’s disclosure about having purchased puts on his raison d’etre, Groupon.

I need to grow up, but I do need to face up to the fact that my raison d’etre is getting those hits..






Probably from even before the time that ancient cave dwellers were able to make wall drawings people have been asking the question.


“Why does it seem that the evil among us thrive?”


The corollary, “Why do bad things happen to good people” is frequently asked and was the topic of a very popular book in the early 1980’s.


That particular book may in fact be the last one that I’ve read, but I’m not certain if there’s a connection.


Newt GingrichWhatever version you take or don’t take your Ten Commandments, it’s clear that good behavior has to be spelled out as do the choices that should be made.


Don’t kill.


Oh. Don’t. Don’t kill. My bad.


I’m not a particularly deep or profound thinker although I took many more than my fair share of philosophy and theology classes in college. In all likelihood I owe my inability to recall any discussions of good versus evil due to an everpresent fog.


Watching episodes of COPS week in and out over the past quarter century it’s clear that the likelihood or high probability of reward is not what drives people to do evil things.


In those cases it’s probably stupidity mixed in equal parts with alcohol that’s responsible for the repeated journeys down the wrong path.


Sometimes it’s profit motive.


Somewhere along the line I’m certain that the expression “the meek shall inherit the earth” was highlighted as an answer to those wondering about the inequity in the world we happen to live in.


Presumably the meek are the 99%. Wherever the other 1% goes it certainly going to appear much more spacious in comparison.


Since human nature is increasingly defined in our fast food world of instant gratification by “I want it now.” the lure of getting a reward in some other as yet unproven world is getting increasingly elusive.


That makes it much easier to rationalize evil deeds. The reward, if any, is now. Let the meek wait in the wings.


When it comes to mentioning people by name, especially in this blog, I tend to do so only when I have something good to say. Something positive. Something laudatory.


The case of Dick Bove is an obvious example of me doing precisely the opposite.


The reality is that the people that I say positive things about don’t need my approval. It’s easy to recognize those that provide added value to the world.


Occasionally, I’ll use someone by name to illustrate what I think will be a funny stream of thought and in those cases it’s not typically in a positive light..


I’m usually wrong about that, as I don’t read people very well, but I least I think the contexts are funny.


Interestingly, on the topic of the Ten Commandments  I did have an opportunity to chat with Newt Gingrich the other day and wanted to get his take on some of the more timely commandments.


His take on adultery was interesting, as he believed that adulterers were essentially a “made up people,” exisiting only as a result of marriage.


His reasoning made a lot of sense, but then you also have to take into consideration the existence of that hot babe in the cave next door.


But see, I used Gingrich, as an example and used his name.


I don’t typically do that, other than in a joking way.


Evil? I don’t think so. I think it’s a good natured way to point out the ridiculousness of things. In this case, all things Gingrich.


Up until the other day my single most popular blog posting, based on the number of hits in a day, was about Herb Greenberg. In that piece I tied my contrarian perspective to measuring how his increasing Twitter popularity was likely related to an upcomiong bullish trend in the markets.


That was an easy piece to write as I greatly respect Herb Greenberg and the role that he plays in ferreting out what many may consider to be “evils” in the marketplace. I think that I’m able to segregate the part of me that may recoil at the mention of a stock that I own from the part of me that respects the objective and probing analyses.


But yesterday I took a decidedly different approach, reminiscent of the “Angry Man in the Street” character of the old, the very old, Steve Allen Show.


You can read it for yourself. Not only did I right a rant, even though I benefitted from what I perceived to be unethical behavior, but I Tweeted incessantly about Dennis Gartman’s decision to publicly disclose that he had liquidated his gold positions, while his clients could not do so.


I may be very wrong in this regard, but it seems as if his clients would be potentially hurt by Gartman’s very public comments and actions.


Had I not known better, but on the basis of the number of Tweets that I had written, I’d have thought that I’d become some single issue lunatic living with 80 feral cats in the basement of my parent’s home.


Well, wouldn’t you know it, in terms of hits onto the blog, bad outswamped good.


Sorry Herb, but flinging arrows seems to be the way to fame.


Now, being one who lives entirely off of the stroke of an ego that comes from a mouse click, that has to get my attention.


It’s the proverbial battle of good versus evil.


Since I’m into corollaries and asking unanswerable questions, that further raises the concept of “is it acceptable to fight evil with evil?”


Sadly, there’s an incredible amount of positive feedback that comes along with successfully getting away with evil acts.


To some degree I wonder if selling call options is an evil act in and of itself.


Not that I’m likely to change my ways, at least not as long as it keeps being rewarding, but doing so exploits others.


Those others are the ones purchasing the call contracts.


You know who they are. They’re the ones that want to generate greatly leveraged returns to satisfy their avarice for riches, although I’ll just conveniently ignore those doing so to protect their portfolios.


Should I feel badly about capitalizing on someone else’s greed? After all, look at all of the evil conferred on society by leverage gone wild.


Boy, now we’re getting into the realm of the “Seven Deadly Sins.”


I suppose that I can take some solace if I sit and realize that there’s a good chance that someone will be purchasing some of my ProShares UltrsShort Silver ETF shares for $12, as it currently sits at about $15.


Now that’s really mean.


But it does pay. And in this case for some unknown call options purchaser, very handsomely at that.


By the same token however, I’m not being hurt too much. After all, I bought that batch of shares for $12.01 about 9 days ago and received $0.64/share premium. Even after expenses that will work out to a 5% ROI.


Hmmm.


So here’s to a world where we can take turns at being evil.


I’m good now, so I guess it’s your turn next, Dennis


 


 


 




Visits: 10

Not So Precious

 

 

 

Today was one of those days that if you were an investor in gold you might be able to remember where you were on this day even 20 years from now. When I say that, just to be clear, I mean 20 years in yen terms.

In fact, I remember where I was 30 years ago when the bottom fell out from under gold and silver. I actually was invested in futures at the time. Not quite as much as the Hunt Brothers, but for me, I was invested much more than I should have been by any measure of sanity.

Fast forward and imagine gold driving away in a white Bronco on the LA freeway. Maybe good advertising for Ford, but not so good for retaining the adjective “precious” in front of your metals holdings.  

Mr. TIf you’re Mr. T your personal net worth plummeted today, but even if you could jump off the ship you would likely sink wih whatever holdings remained, unlike your Captain, who had the foresight to jump ship earlier, with the lone flotation device aboard, without alerting the crew and those that trusted him to guide them on their journey.

 Metaphor? Not really.

 Captain Gartman. Good move driving that Bronco and jumping that ship.

 Did I mention that he took the map that also gave the location of all the sharks in the water?

I don’t own gold in any investment form, unless you count the potential value of my body if all of its component elements are sold upon my demise. I didn’t get those dental crowns as an investment. I got them because of bad habits.

Too bad there’s no market for cholesterol.

A few months ago while on CNBC, James Altucher raised some eyebrows, as he usually does anyway, when he pointed out the obvious.

“It’s a rock.”

Alright, in deference to my geologian readers, that’s not totally accurate, but even you you have to admit that you understand exactly what he was saying.

Yes, it’s precious, but how many times have you heard comments like “you can’t eat it, it won’t keep ypu warm, etc..’?

Usually, those kind of comments come from the likes of people that either can’t afford gold at its current price or by choice haven’t invested in any because they think it’s overpriced.

Those same people often discover that it can be eaten or keep you warm if it’s at the right price.

Forget the axiom that value is determined by whatever someone is willing to pay for the asset.

That’s only true when supply is well in excess of demand.

When it’s the other way around there’s no rational basis for price. Factor in fear, greed and the all too popular, FOMO.

The other day, Dennis Gartman, a noted investor, newsletter writer, talking head and whatever else he does announced that he had gotten out of gold.

Good for him.

It was actually indirectly good for me as well, as I own many shares of the ProShares UltraShort Silver ETF which goes up as the price of silver, another of those precious metals, goes down.

But what I really don’t understand is what Gartman was thinking.

In fact, he only sold gold from his personal account and very publicly proclaimed that fact. Reportedly, the managed accounts that he has for his clients preclude him from making such changes until the end of the month.

So it really was good for him.

His clients? Eh, not so much.

Now, if I was a Gartman client and a portion of my funds was tied up in gold, I don’t think that I’d be very happy to hear the steward of my account proclaiming to the world that he’s liquidated his personal gold holdings and I’m left with the bag.

Hey. What? He did what?

From my perspective and perhaps limited advantage, he sought to protect his reputation at the expense of his clients’ pockets.

Imagine, as an investor, there you are in a perfect position to watch the value of your portfolio plummet because the captain of the ship not only jumped, but let the world know that the ship was sinking before he let his crew know.

Captain Gartman.

With captains like that you don’t need Somali pirates. Especially when the captain alerts the pirates to your exact coordinates, what assets you’re carrying and what meager defenses you maintain.

My guess is that Captain Gartman would sell immediate salvage rights on his way out.

As a captain, Gartman may defend himself and say he doesn’t know the meaning of the word “fear” and didn’t act out of such emotion.

I might add that he doesn’t know the meaning of the word “fiduciary” either and certainly didn’t act in that manner.

But back to those ProShares UltraShort Silver ETF shares..

I’ve droned on about them for a while. Even though my average cost is $13 and with yesterday and today’s big drop in silver prices, it is up to about $15, my profit is predominantly from its sweet options premiums, even though the ETF capital gains are looking good, too..

Slowly and against my better judgment, those shares have become about 15% of my portfolio, making them well out of proportion to any other single holding.

But the premiums have been so precious.

Happily, I’ll be losing about 20% of those shares at $13. I would be happier if they were going to be assigned at $15, but those shares were purchased at about $12 and have gotten more than their fair share of premiums.

In the meantime, if the shares do close above $15 by Friday’s bell, I lose all of my shares.

Normally, I’d be somewhat saddened at losing such a money maker, but I’m beginning to salivate at what appear to be some bargain prices right now for lots of my other favorites.

The situation happens with regularity, but what makes this different is that I may have lots of cash available to pick up those bargains on Monday.

Caterpillar, Halliburton and Freeport McMoRan are yelling to me. They may not be precious right now, but they will be once again.

And if it should happen that I lose my ProShares UltraShort Silver ETF shares, guess what?

Yeah, Silver will go back up again and the price of the inverse and leveraged ETF will go back down.

Been there and done that.

Although the value of assets can rise and fall, if there’s inherent value, they will rise again.

Just look at Gold and silver.

Sure, it may have taken nearly 30 years, but their precious status returned.

Reputation? That precious attribute that you can work a lifetime to attain? That’s not so easy to resurrect.

I’ve never had the “privilege” of being a Dennis Gartman client, but his reputation and credibility have lost whatever luster they had, at least in my eyes.

Not so precious, anymore. 

 

 

 

Visits: 11

Rumorville






 


As a relatively “unsocial” kind of guy, I’ve been very slow to adopt to social media. In fact, it was only at the advice, suggestion and arm twisting by my kids to use social media as a tool to sell books and get people to read this blog, did I reluctantly agree that they may be right.


Ego is an amazing thing.


Over the past 25 years, the only other things that I was slow to adopt was the one time ubiquitous “PDA” and the “mullet.”


Palm, Treo, Handspring. Whatever the names and models were, it’s all a blur, I never went that way although I may someday go for the retro look as nostalgia is due for its next generational comeback.


I’ll think about that after tonight’s Hall and Oates concert.


Today was just another one of those laughable days in the rumor mills. Good thing, because it was an otherwise utterly boring day with no news coming out of the EU and with Herman Cain out of sight.


As trades go, I sold Caterpillar calls, bought some more ProShares UltraSilver ETF and subsequently sold calls and that was all.


Boring.


As much as I took delight in my accurate prediction about retail sales, when it was reported that they were disappointing (in advance of the revised results after Christmas which will indicate that they were better than expected), it was still a tiresome day.


NetflixThe best rumor and the one that got the most attention was about Netflix.


I own Netflix and have for about a month or so. In that time I’ve sold lots of weekly calls. Sometimes I’ve had the shares assigned and other times not.


Sometimes I’ve bought the shares back and sometimes I haven’t.


This week started with a reduced holding due to an assignment of a portion of my shares, but as luck would have it, the rumor mill started early.


And often.


Monday started with the rumor of a Verizon buyout of Netflix. WIth the market spending most of the day down 2%, Netflix was up about 7% in reaction.


Although I did my obligatory sale of calls, as has been my recent habit, I was a premature speculator and sold the calls a bit too early.


This morning, in the pre-market, the rumors started anew and Netflix surged.


Now if they were as good at streaming speed as the quick fashion in which the stock price gave up the ghost in the pre-open following a suggestion that Verizon was denying any interest in a buyout, they’d have a pretty great product,


The rumors and their rationalizations were fascinating.


Sometime in the past 24 hours the speculation was that Verizon was fueling the rumors to drive up Netflix’s stock price to make it a less attractive take over candidate for anyone else.


This is the kind of rumor that may be referred to as a “conspiracy.”


Interestingly in my area, Verizon FIOS ads still tout the ill conceived and subsequently aborted Netflix pricing plan as a reason to make the switch over to FIOS. It’s not really accurate, but that really doesn’t matter, because it was accurate at one time. For a couple of days, for that matter.


That seems like a better strategy to make it less appealing to anyone else.


Attack their business through that good old American concept of competition. Sure, unfounded rumors are good, too, if you want to cause your opponent to stumble a bit.


But driving up their price?


Then it was a return to the plain vanilla rumor that started it all.


Verizon was planning to buy Netflix.


Although a Verizon spokesperson later said that there were no such talk, many in the investing world believed that the issue was not whether there would be a buyout, but whether anyone would figure out that the holdup was due to both parties being caught up in a Verizon telephone menu loop. All that’s needed is for someone to realize that all they have to do is press “O” to be connected to a buyout specialist.


In the meantime, Netflix was then played to the vest. No one really knowing which way to go.


As a seller of options I like movement because volatility drives up premiums. But once I get those premums, I love stagnation. That may also explain why I haven’t matured one bit after 27 years of marriage.


So while the Netflix story plays out, and my time horizon is only a week at a time, attention was turned to Zynga.


Zynga is one of those social media phenomena that I haven’t adopted.


Best known for its Facebook resident games, especially Farmville, it’s due to come public at the end of this week.


As opposed to most other recent tech and social media IPO’s, Zynga is different in a number of ways.


One is that it is reportedly and surprisingly not a fun place to work. Brain drain is especially expensive when brains are your leading commodity. An unhappy mind is not a creative mind.


What was especially interesting is that in advance of the IPO, one analyst has already come out with a “sell” recommendation based on an “underperform” prediction.


Now I know knothing about Zynga or its products, but I do know that investors are willing to pay for growth opportunity.


Zynga is so heavily tied to Facebook, there’s obviously a liability asociated if Facebook heads in a different direction. Ask any Apple suppliers that have seen the Golden Goose seek better priced vendors.


But really, how much more is Facebook itself going to grow?


How many more new games that set the social media world on fire, especially without cannibalizing its exisiting game base, will Zynga put forward?


Besides, once they’ve seen the next big fad, how are you going to keep them down on the Farmville?


Seems to me that buying Zynga shares is akin to buying out a floppy disk maker about a decade ago.


What Zynga needs is something that will capture the interest of the 1%, like me, who don’t want to get their virtual hands dirty by playing Farmville.


Maybe “Rumorville” is the next logical step. Trade in the green of the farm for the green of the portfolio.


Buy and sell analytical tools, inside information, algorithms and television appearances.


Want to be a talking head? No problem. All you need is the right currency. “Want to be a rainmaker?”


Immunity from prosecution? You can buy it, just like in real life.


I suppose that if you’re on the short end of a rumor it’s not very funny, but that’s the chance you take, especially with all of these momentum stocks bouncing around.


For now, as long as Netflix stays above $65 and trades in a predictable range, I can be a very happy guy.


Maybe even enough so to be a sociable kind of guy, as well.


Nah.


 


Follow me on Facebook and Twitter. Clearly my overt display of anti-social behavior is a cry out to be liked.


 


 


 


 


 





Visits: 10

Quiero Taco Bell






 


This is another in a series of guest blogs from George Pick. As a reminder, most people forget that Lt. Col. Pick was the 12th and last man to walk on the moon. However, he is indelibly engraved in history for being the only individual to have had a bowel movement on the lunar surface. The expression “mooning” has its roots from that autumn day in 1972. Today, Lt. Col. Pick (Ret.) moons school children as a much sought after motivational speaker.

 

Here I am on a Saturday morning.

 

It’s actually pre the morning 5 mile walk and the oatmeal and blueberry routine. Healthy body, healthy mind. They can actually wait a bit longer.

 

What I really want is a Taco Bell, but that’s not going to happen.

 

What does everybody do at 5 AM before getting on with health pursuits, but look at stock charts?

 

After looking at my chart scans I thought of how charts relate to life itself. Beng the analytical creature that likes to tear things down to the very core, that is exactly what I proceeded to do.

 

Some call it being a pain in the butt, but I like to think of myself as a cerebral misfit. I love to question but I also love to get stupid. The latter probably overwhelms the description that preceeded it.

“I asked her name, she said blah…blah…blah…she wore 9/10 pants and a very big bra…”


O.K. I’m back…..


Tea CupMy “Any Of You”  thread includes a stock ticker. MGIC Investment Corp, whose ticker is MTG. It is probably my favorite stock of the past two months.


It has formed a chart pattern called a cup and handle.


The “Cup and Handle” was first described by William O’Neill in his 1988 book “How to Make Money with Stocks. It is also the same William O’Neill whose name shows up on my caller ID when someone using his good name is pitching a free no obligation trial leading to a subscription to Investors’ Business Daily.


I need IBD like I need IBS. Just talk of Taco Bell makes that bowel irritable. Yet, yo quiero Taco Bell.


Maybe a nice soothing tea instead.


Anyway, the Cup and Handle represents a bullish continuation pattern.


After the handle is formed and hurries to the resistance line which is predicated by the tops of the shoulders as well as the head….ah “head” one of my favorite words…say it again “head” I will be back in a minute….O.K I’m back…the thrill for all chart watchers occurs “THE BREAKOUT”


Not the OXY 5 breakout where you have to cleanse properly like Jessica Simpson., this is the cash money breakout. Not cashmoney as in the rapper crew….this is DOLLARS AND CENTS….blue skies….no resistance type of breakout. This is what we wait for as we have nurtured the formation of the cup ourselves from early August till early December.


You are in a relationship with the cup.


You watch it go up and down. You tell it where to go.


You get mad at it when it goes down and you give it an “ATTABOY”  when it goes back up.


As you get confirmation of the formation of the handle you realize you have fathered the cup to finality. You have led it down the preconceived path that was destined for your precious cup


Ah, what a proud PAPPA.


As MTG prepares to leave its nest and head for blue skies you realize the hard work it took to get to this point. How many ups and downs did it take to reach the end point? But you needed all the ups to realize the downs and all the downs to realize the ups. Without all this there would be no cup and the handle would have nothing to attach itself to, thus voiding the breakout.


No ups, no downs?


That means no handle and no breakout. All the ups and downs are IMPORTANT….they are VITAL…to complete one’s journey….one cannot be accomplished without the other….


It all boils down to that classic “WHAT GOES UP MUST COME DOWN” unless it has lasted for 4 hours then quickly call a doctor or in my case screw the doctor I am calling 1-800-…or maybe I should just screw the doctor if I am going there any way.


I think I am on to something here.


“You ….you got what I need but you say he’s just a friend…..yeah you say he’s just a friend…oh you…you got”


O.K. I’m back….


Life as a stock is no different than our lives when it comes to ups and downs. Both need the ups and the downs to form the end point. You just do not realize the relevance of the parts at the time of formation but it becomes crystal clear in the end.


As for MTG, I give you a personal thank you for the opportunity to watch you grow from a little $2.16 kid to a $3.78 teenager and looking forward to your $5.26 tenure as an adult.


PAPPA is proud but after $5.26 you are on your own as I need to nuture my other kids.


“The cats in the cradle and the silver spoon…..”


YEAH….YEAH

 





Visits: 13

Dusting Off Old Habits

I have a very cloudy crystal ball.

The cloudiness is internal and is just reflective of my own degrading and poorly capable neural mechanisms. It just doesn’t know how to deal with data and apply appropriate weightings to streaming information. It also seems to be incapable of consistently recognizing when patterns are likely to reverse.

My crystal ball is also in need of dusting as lots of extraneous factors get in the way of rationally approaching the prediction business. Some of those external factors may be personal baggage, while others just represent the irrational world as it attempts to interpret facts and rumors.

Anyway, my crystal ball is in constant need of dusting.

So I don’t begin to believe that I know what’s going to happen by even the next keystroke. I’m envious of all of those that regularly appear on TV and are able to forecast the future.

I’m especially envious of those that don’t care about the eventual outcome of predictions and who don’t believe in the concept of “report cards.” You can either look at predictions as being purely of entertainment value or as a guide for how to live your life.

I don’t see them in either of those ways.

In a perfectly ordered world simple mathematical principles should help to explain all events; past, present and future.

Maybe that’s the way it is on our newly discovered twin planet, Kepler 22b, the one that they’re calling “super earth,” but it sure isn’t that way here.

Yet mathemeticians, statisticians and physicists are widely sought after by financial firms who clearly believe that the market continues to be a rational place that can be dissected into a collection of equations that cascade with great predictability.

Given that the little guy doesn’t move the needle very much, I can only believe that in a zero sum game the big winners of the day are very similar to the big losers of that same day, in that both place great reliance on high priced objective tools that are used to predict the behavior of a rational market.

I can also surmise that those that win on one day are every bit as likely to lose on the next, as is the opposite true.

Otherwise, we would see the extinction of those that are in the habit of losing and then it would no longer be a zero sum game.

It would be a Charlie Sheen like universe with only winners prowling the markets.

As result, the only logical explanation can be that the crystal ball used by the big boys is every bit as cloudy, but is more capable of moving the needle.

Presumably, trading algorithms can only suffer from cloudiness of design, rather than being subject to dustty conditions, so they have me at an advantage.

The one thing my crystal ball has been good at has been to realize that computer storage media will evolve, leaving older prehistoric forms worthless as the hardware necessary to read the media of yesterday all become extinct.

So before the inevitable would happen I always transferred my files to the latest generation of storage. My old 5 1/4′ floppies gave way to 3 1/2″ less floppy disks, which in turn gave way to CD, then to DVD and then to various USB ported external devices. To my credit, I also foresaw the need to skip the Blu-Ray option.

The other day, while cleaning out a closet in preparation for Phase 2 of our re-carpet process, I discovered a long ago forgotten PC in a closet. It was a tremendously heavy first generation Pentium processor with a 1 gigabyte hard drive and no USB ports.

I remember thinking just how “kick ass” that sweet gig of storage was going to be.

And it was until the world invented music and photos.

In the time before there was art of any sort that computer was all that anyone could have ever needed.

I didn’t dust off that computer, but I did dust off an old statistical analysis program that I used to use back in the days when I actually did “research” and back when my existence may have offered “added value.”

I thought that perhaps a methodoligical approach to data could help my crystal ball see just a bit more clearly.

Luckily, I’d saved the installation disks, which had come on those 3 1/2” floppies onto a CD, in anticipation of the death of the floppy. I even knew where to find that CD, although I hadn’t used the program in about 10 years.

What prompted the need to dust that statistics package off was the desire to see whether there was any correlation between Friday and Monday market closes over the past 6 months.

My semi-casual observation indicated that there was some kind of an association, but I needed more confirmation.

Obviously, the very thought that I would uncover some previously undiscoverd correlation was delusional, as if all of the highly compensated people designing prediction models hadn’t already looked at every single possible relationship imagineable. I mean if someone has looked at variables such as Original conference of Super Bowl winner in a leap year, then days of the week had to be a given.

It’s just that no one ever told me.

Increasingly, it had empirically seemed to me that we were seeing large moves on Fridays which especially puzzled me if those large moves were to the positive side.

WIth all of the uncertainty these days, whatever happened the the adage of not wanting to be long stocks over the weekend?

Take this past Friday, for example. The market ended up just shy of 200 points.

Again.

In fact, we’ve seen 13 triple digit moves on Fridays over the past 31 weeks. 7 of those have been upward moves. Since George Bush declared that he had won a mandate in 2000 with less than 50% of the popular vote, I suppose that you could be justified in saying that 7 out of 13 represented a mandate of some sort.

But as it turned out, no matter how I sliced, diced and transformed the data, the chances of having a big move on Friday is not likely to predicate anything for the coming Monday. What is not likely to happen, though, is seeing a triple digit upward move on Friday followed by an equal move on Monday.

In fact, of the 16 triple digit moves on Monday, only 5 had been preceded by a triple digit Friday.

Too bad.

As the final week of the December options cycle comes to an end, I only need toi replace shares of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters and Netflix, due to assignment.

That means that everything else could benefit from a nice rise on Monday.

What I can predict is that on weeks that I suffer lots of assignments I love seeing Mondays open in a decidedly negative direction so that I could use the newly available cash to pick up bargains.

I can also predict that on those weeks that I don’t have much cash to reinvest I love seeing a strong jump out of the box so that I can sell optins into the strength.

I suppose that represents an algorithm of some sort. I may have to give myself a nice Christmas bonus for that one.

After dusting off the statistics program and evaluating the past 31 weeks of Friday and Monday closing data, creating subsets of triple digit moves on either of those days and then looking at absolute values, as well, I came to the conclusion that nothing really mattered.

“The trend is your friend” has given way to “MoMo” stocks that could just as easily become your worst enemy as your friend.

With all of the talk last week of a stock market melt up, coming fresh off the heels of the same people who the previous week had characterized the market’s move as reflecting a “dead cat bounce,” my inartful analyis says that there’s very little reason to believe that any melt up will happen on Monday.

If I’m wrong, I can always go back to my old profession and at least put that duster to the use for which it was intended.

Visits: 13

Lazy or Respectful?

 

There was no reason for me to think that while on a cab ride going through the heart of Downtown Nashville on Tuesday, that Dobie Gray would breathe his last breathes on that same day and in that same city.

But that’s exactly what happened on that cool and damp day as I went past the famous Ryman Auditorium and saw endless pedestrians with cowboy hats and guitar cases probably sharing the same hopes and dreams, but unlikely to ever find their way into the major leagues of obituary pages, The New York Times.

Other than introducing the song “The In Crowd”, which was a bigger hit when Ramsey Lewis covered it, you may know him for his continually popular “Drift Away.”

I don’t really know him from any of his other works, but I found it poignant when after today’s closing bell, where the market dropped an additional 100 points in the last 45 minutes, Bob Pisani on CNBC referred to the market as just having “drifted away.”

Maybe Dobie was on his mind.

I’ve been a Bruce Springsteen fan for nearly 40 years and have seen him in concert a number of times and cities over that time. Along with others, I grieved when the Big Man died, but it was clear at a concert in Baltimore a few years ago that the body was a shell, while the talent and dirve were undying.

Dobie Gray just quietly drifted away.

Springsteen is an original and rarely covers other artists.

When he does it’s an indelible stamp for those that typically need no such approval or recognition.

Bob Dylan, Buddy Holly, Elvis and Pete Seeger, of course come to mind.

And Dobie Gray. 

Covering an artists work can be interpreted in two different ways.

For some, it is a sign of laziness and lack of creativity. The fear of relying on your own talents to please the ultimate judges who decide your professional fate. It is often a sign of low confidence and playing it safely.

Or, performing a cover can be the ultimate sign of respect that one artist can pay to another.

Although the cynics will also say that performing a cover version can also be the ultimate expression of self-importance as someone tries to put their own spin on a classic. It also may be an expression of opportunism, as I doubt that Ramsey Lewis covered The In Crowd as a tribute to a then small player, Dobie Gray.

Sometimes you just know a good thing when it comes along and you have to act.

But I’m not the cynical kind, unless you’re talking about life and the people who populate the environment in which the world exists.

No doubt that in Springsteen’s case he didn’t really need to draw on anyone else’s body of work. But when he did, they were doozies. Always respectful and always faithful to the vision of the artist honored.

As with Dobie Gray.

In much the same vein, I know that my approach to investing and trying to make my portfolio grow is the ultimate in laziness.

I buy the same stocks, over and over again. I call the list of stocks that I choose from my list of “Old Reliables”. No doubt that each of them was at some point put on my radar screen by someone on TV.

In all likelihood, I then followed and watched for cyclicality and the size of the reward for selling options.

In the case of Ricky Nelson, who put out the hit “Garden Party” in response to the booing he received at a concert in Madison Square Garden where he didn’t play the “old reliables” and got booed, I also only have to please myself.

No, I’m not talking about some kind of investing self-gratification, but I am talking about investment and gratification. The singles gratify me, even if they come at the expense of the homers.

I gave up on trying to be creative. Not only do I have a bad voice, but I can only barely play the accordian, so I know that I won’t be filling any auditoria on my own.

I gave also up on trying to pick stocks and certainly gave up on trying to time purchases to maximize profits.

I recognized, before it was too late, that I was never going to be anything but a cover artist.

Like some Elvis impersonator, I make believe that I know what I’m doing, but in reality, I don’t.

I knw that and so do you.

I don’t really understand fundamental analysis and that probably explains why I don’t have the patience to even attempt to learn. I probably am subconsciously avoiding putting myself into the situation where I would have to admit that “I just don’t get it.”

Except for the fact that I’m fully and consciously now aware of that denial and avoidance strategy.

But like that aging Elvis impersonator, you can make a comfortable, maybe even a very comfortable living without ever coming up with a single original thought.

So I just copy what I’ve done before and then hedge those totally creative lacking decisions by, wouldn’t you know it. covering.

I cover myself and my holdings because I know what my audience wants.

Sugar Momma and I are that audience and like that immortalized Garden crowd of a generation ago, we want safety but we don’t want boredom.

There’s not much respectful about what I do. It’s predominantly laziness and trying to sense opportunities.

Most of the time those opportunities are just the taken from the sense that everything you see, at least when it comes to the shares of solid companies are just part of a trip up or down a sine curve.

I say “solid companies” because I don’t like to think about micro-economic or industry specific issues. I certainly don’t want to get involved in company specific issues.

Except….

Except when there’s an opportunity. Oh Ramsey Lewis, how you’ve molded me.

I look at opportuinities as being on the speculative spectrum and with speculation comes undue risk, which more often than not dwarfs the chance of reward.

I prefer probability over possibility.

Most of the time.

But lately, there’s been opportunity whenever a Chinese company gets maligned. At least when the darts are being flung by Muddy Waters.

In those cases, there’s been nice opportunity, such as very recently with Focus Media to take positions after the big price hits have occured and the  s**t has cleared the fan.

Even when the accusations may prove to be acuirate, there seems to be a calming period when there’s opportunity to sell puts or buy shares and write covered calls. Just like Ramsey Lewis did, sometimes you take advantage of a good thing when it comes along.

I’m not proud. I don’t mind saying that I know nothing of Focus Media, did no independent research and have no real strategy. I would be happy to toss it out next week, when the options cycle ends.

In the case of Focus Media, which was up today to $21.50, despite the 200 point plunge, I sold puts at $15 and $16, back when the stock was at $16, barely 10 days ago. Since then, I also picked up shares at $20.71 and sold $20 calls.

Wow. That’s all over the place.

Maybe the lack of coherency is a sign of creativity or maybe it’s just a sign of situational opportunism.

Either way, I’m covered.

Today’s drastic drop in the market was related to a slew of disappointments with regard to reaching financial, fiscal and policy agreements by the members of the EU.

Then, a slew of all new and unrecognizable acronyms hit the same fan that everyone had thought the s**t had  already cleared.

But in the meantime, I’m looking at the possibility of buying back some of those shares that were assigned from me just a few days ago, this coming monday.

The shares that drifted away may be drifting back. Too bad Dobie Gray never found the opportunity to record that obvious follow-up tune.

The best part about all of this is that I did nothing. Talk about laziness. I respect the art of laziness as I spend my day resting in the aptly named La-Z-Boy and let the Dobie Grays of the world do the hard work while leaving a legacy behind for the less talented and knowing, as myself, to avail.

As I listen to someone talking about things “going more pear shaped,” it continues to crystallize.

At this point, I’m even too lazy to Google that expression.

 I increasingly realize that I need to stay lazy and avoid cluttering my mind with confounders. I can’t compete with those that are actually trying to move forward. I’ll just happily thrive in their wake and smile on their way down and again when they bob back up.

I’ll stick with the tried and tested lazy man’s way.

Thank you to the Dobie Grays of the world. You’re appreciated for having paved the way.

And for “The Dobie Gray,” you gave the world one of its most hummable songs, which is just the lazy way for us untalented sorts to make it our own.

Visits: 5

The Spilled Milk Bounce






 


I grew up in a household where in my early years English was decidedly a second language.


Even as my parents quickly became fluent in speaking and reading the language of their adopted country, one thing that they didn’t adopt was the use of classically American idiomatic expressions.


Although I’m certain that most such expressions have their counterparts in other cultures, our household, at the very least was idiomatically deprived. Adages were never tossed about as part of casual conversation, nor were parables frequently used to teach life lessons.


Well, other than the obvious “Never let a Cossack into your home while your daughters are there alone.”


In fact, while I did quite well on the SAT exams, I’m certain that what kept me from having an asterisk next to my name was the fact that deciphering the meanings of such expressions as part of a multiple choice exam was somehing beyond my naturalized ability.


The exam was just culturally biased against me and probably even against those that did the actual marauding, raping and pillaging. Those poor Cossacks never stood a chance.


Over the years, though, I’ve learned some of the very basics, although I don’t seek to apply them under any circumstances, except maybe to illustrate a point, almost like what an idiom tries to do.


Silver Lining? Got it, every cloud has one.


Don’t s**t where you sleep? Got that one too. Damn good advice.


Spilled MilkBut last week I was following a path opposite that advised by another popular expression: “Don’t cry over spilled milk.”


I suppose that in the affluence of America that certainly holds true, but how could you even think to say that in parts of Bangladhesh? Or how can you even remotely suggest that to someone who’s let stock profits disappear into someone else’s pockets?


For them, it’s the end of the world as they know it.


But I get it. It’s done. It’s over. Move on. Sunk costs, etc.


But there I was last week moaning the losses of some favorite stocks as they closed above the strike prices at which I sold their call contracts.


One, which I only passingly mentioned over the past few days was Halliburton.


Halliburton, like my other favorites is such, because it predictably spins off a nice options premium. Unfortunately, it’s not one of my triple threat stocks because it has only a pathetic dividend.


It has the attractive premium because if you’re the type that worries about paper losses, you’ll need the money for antacids. It’s just a little volatile and reacts to news, rumors and politically shifting winds.


You need to have a bit of extra stomach lining when you own Halliburton. You also have to ignore its close association with lots of bad things over the years that may make you question the morality of investing in such a company.


I don’t have those kind of qualms, so Cheney, I’m talking to you. In fact, as much as I love New Orleans, making it a regular vacation spot, I applaud the Food Industry portion of Halliburton for its much maligned effort to engineer self frying fish in the Gulf of Mexico.


After all, that seemed like the natural extension and transfer of volatility from the stock to the fish.


When it comes to Halliburton, “What you don’t know won’t hurt you.”


There’s an adage for every situation.


While busy moaning, a funny thing happened. In fact, it was the sort of thing that I always count on happening and welcome with open arms.


Like now.


Jut 3 days after losing my Halliburton shares at $35 for a final options premium of only $0.28, bringing the total 3 months’ premium to $4.56 in addition to that pathetic dividend, it was time to stop moaning and do something.


That something was to snap up shares of Halliburton as it had come down to $33.50 from more than $37.


Although I did shed some metaphorical tears deep down I knew that I would never have taken profits with Halliburton at $37. I never would have sold my shares because you can’t completely escape your human nature, despite the discipline that you seek to impose.


That’s reasonably logical to assume and as we all know logic is  “the opium of the people.”


With the need to moan and feel badly about a lost opportunity that was never really lost, only repackaged, it was time to moan about another boring day in the markets.


And it really was a boring trading session for most of the day until the final 20 minutes.


That was when a rumor came out of Japan that the through the efforts of the G-20 the IMF was going to be able to float $600 Billion to the EU as part of a lending facility. Of course that would be done through the ECB.


Got it? G-20, IMF, EU and ECB. Not as catchy an idiom as the others, but still obvious in its intent.


Seeking to dispel the thought that there was even an opportunity to be “looking a gift horse in the mouth”, the IMF then denied the rumor and the market which had added 80 points in a couple of minutes then shed half of those in the final two minutes of trading.


Honestly? I don’t know what a gift horse is and none of this really effected me or my shares.


During the course of the day I did have the opportunity to make a few trades, but they seemed to follow in my recent usual pattern.


That pattern, which is one that I’m not very happy about, is to sell call options literally minutes before the underlying stock takes a sharp move upward.


Why would I do that?


Because I’m an idiot who can’t tell the future, even when its only a minute ahead.


Today, it was my turn to sell weekly calls on Goldman Sachs and the beleagured Netflix.


The same happened last week with Green Mountain, Caterpillar, JP Morgan and Halliburton.


There may have been some others, but my mind is beginning to shut down as it needs to make room for more idioms.


Over the past few years I’ve done pretty well trying to collect small option premiums, that I refer to as crumbs, just a couple of days before expiration.


Now, with the growth of weekly options, I do that sort of thing much more than ever. Although there were always instances in which I might have regretted one of those crumb picking expeditions, by and large its been a good strategy..


That is until the milk starting spilling.


All of this is pretty ironic since the primary site from which I sell the Option to Profit book is called Milking Stocks.


With all of the economic uncertainty in Europe it truly amazes me that markets would go up on Fridays and traders would stay long into the weekend.


But see, that’s where logic is misleading.


The problem is taking the contrarian approach would lead you to believe that Fridays would represent opportunities to sell off, and therefore, good opportunities to sell call contracts in anticipation.


But logic would tell you the same.


The intersection of logic and contrarianism can’t exist and they certainly can’t be the same.


Given a recent factoid that I posted last week regarding the decided overall downward bias on Mondays, over the past 6 months, traders still stay long and instead of my crumb picking sold options expiring worthless on Friday, they’re saying goodbye to my portfolio as they transition into some nameless and faceless portfolio.


But there I go. Moaning again.


You don’t have to be lactose intolerant to know that neither the spilling of the milk nor the crying over it are worthwhile endeavors.


In the meantime, every talking head is once again warning of a melt up in stock prices.


Logic or contrarian approach? Which to apply to the consensus opinion?


I’m going to stick with the contrary approach and will look to sell other holdings into any strength that may pop up on Thursday.


I may not be able to “tell a book by its cover,” but I do know that sooner or later I’m bound to guess right.and maybe start to “milk  it for all it’s worth” once again.


 





Visits: 10

Pull the Plug






Pull the PlugI’ve already made my wishes pretty clear.


After seeing the latest George Clooney movie, “The Descendants”, I definitely don’t want the plug to stay in the wall whenever that time comes along, as it most certainly will.


Nor do I want my loved ones tearing me a new one as I helplessly lay comatose in an overpriced hospital room if (when) by chance they discover some dark secret about me that will occur sometime in the distant future.


Or while I was 500 miles away from home today.


It seemed funny in the movie, but I think that would mar the legacy that I’m actively trying to fabricate.


So, in the event that the documents I’ve previously completed in response to the certainty of the former occuring  are misplaced, let today’s blog serve as a legal document as to my intentions.


Pull the plug. Let me go.


But I don’t think that I need to worry about anyone forgetting what my wishes were.


Although letting go is so hard, one of my sons has already given indication that he’s ready to pull as and when needed.


Even going so far as to smother me, if necessary.


On a day like Tuesday when I was up in the air enroute to a meeting, there was very little, if any evidence on Twitter or elsewhere on-line that I was engaged in any cognitive activity. Based on my usual level of activity, Tuesday was if I had flatlined, with only an occasional spasm reminiscent of a neurovascular bundle firing one last time in a headless chicken..


If I neglect to tell my oldest son of such travel plans, he takes my on-line silence as a sign of my death or irreversible incapacity and immediately begins making plans for the reallocation of my portfolio under his watchful eye.


But when the time does come, I know that I’ll be able to count on him, regardless of how difficult or painful the decision may be. However, he is the son that I’ve also had to school of the definition of “terminal illness,” so as no to be confused with a “sinus headache.”


Sometimes it’s not really your time.


This past Friday I wrote about the possibility of taking a loss on my options contracts in Green Mountain Coffee Roasters following the stock’s short term irrational move upward and the looming contract expiration later that same day.


Faced with the crisis of the loss of a loved one, the underlying shares, sometimes you begin to dabble in irrational thoughts that go counter to the rules of nature. After a while, the dignified thing to do is to stop resuscitative efforts and go on.


When it’s your time you keep your option contract premiums and just let the stock go.


But I just didn’t want to lose my shares. I wasn’t ready for the inevitable. I was even willing to take a loss on the option contracts despite knowing that Green Mountain could just as easily choose to succumb to the improper accounting allegations and take me into the crypt along with it.


I thought about the good times I had with Green Mountain in the past, having first bought shares at about $28 probably a year or so ago.


In the meantime we found ourselves frolicking through the lush fields of green that were lined by all of those option premiums. Occasionally we’d lose sight of one another as someone else would come along and exercise their right to take my shares from me, but somehow we always got back together.


And it was always good.


But lately, Green Mountain was becoming unrecognizable to me.


I’d been there before, though. I thought back to some of the other stocks whose plugs I had pulled without even the slightest thought.


Hewlett Packard, Dell Computer and others sharing one predominant characteristic..


In all of the previous cases the decisions weren’t so difficult once I realized that technology stocks and I were never meant to be together. I should have realized that much sooner, as an early venture into the fledgling, but poorly conceived Putnam Information Sciences mutual fund nearly 30 years ago proved to be a poor decision.


“Technology is the next big thing,” or so they said.


With those I never looked back, never thought about sacrificing the options profits for the parent stock.


But I’d professed my love for Green Mountain in front of an audience of dozens.


Or thousands, as I’m not realy certain how many people actually watch Bloomberg Rewind.


I do, but then again, I also anthropromorphize stocks, so maybe I’m not the best one to set an example.


Although I did the right thing, or at least believe I did, the truth is that I couldn’t do without my Green Mountain.


Not the coffee. That’s pretty insipid.


But I repurchased the shares that I’d just lost and proving that I’m incapable of learning from my unfortunate recent journey, went and sold in the money call options on my repurchased shares.


It’s like putting the plug right back in, just to have a chance to pull it again.


Strange, but I could never understand people whose pet had just passed and then immediately went out and got an identical pet as  a replacement for their beloved friend.


Yet, no such thoughts over stocks, despite the tendency to anthropromorphize.


In fact, I’m more than happy to see some shares go with no greater joy than to get them back in the fold as quickly as possible.


Today, while waiting for the plane’s door to be shut at 9:50 AM, I was able to pick up shares of Deere and then do the obligatory thing and sell calls on those shares.


Unfortunately, and yet again, now for the 8th time in about a month, I’ve been aboard a Southwest Airlines jet that wasn’t equipped with Wi-Fi.


But, as it turned out, not too much happened in the 90 minutes that I was cut off from my version of civilization. I really missed nothing other than the chance to not be overly concerned about missing something potentially important.


Upon landing, I picked up some additional shares of Textron, and, you guessed it, sold some call options.


As I think about, my reflexive sale of call options is the ultimate endorsement of pulling the plug.


Most knowledgeable about investor psychology will tell you that the single most difficult thing for an investor to do is to sell shares. Not because it’s so hard to let go, but because greed intervenes and sends the message that whatever profits are available are but a mere pittance of what could be on the table if you only had the cajones.


But by selling calls, especially in the absence of any emotion surrounding their exercise, the decision to sell is made for you as circumstances unfold. It’s the equivalent of Advanced Directives for the investor.


What more of a natural way to see the life of a holding run its course?


No need for controversy, no discussion regarding ethics.


Just a very simpel transaction.


We all know that we’ll all go down that same path, so why not do it in an non-impasioned fashion and maintaining dignity for all?


So for me, there’ll be nor more angst like that which I just went through.


Just as “Ashes to Ashes and dust to dust..” has real meaning, so too should every stock have a life cycle that runs its course without extraordinary intervention.


In the meantimes, believe me, it’s just a sinus headache.


 


 




Visits: 10

Rational or Emotional?






EmotionsIt’s so hard to balance the emotional side from the rational side in all aspects of life.


Although I often write and talk about setting aside human tendencies like fear, greed and envy when it comes to investing, it’s so much easier to say than it is to practice.


Life itself is no different.


The other day I posted a comment on James Altucher’s blog. If you haven’t read the Altucher Confidential, you really should take a look. He writes in an entertaining way and addresses universal emotions and trials by recounting his own life experiences.


However, in response to the comment, I received a reply that was interesting, to say the least and was the impetus for today’s theme.


My initial comment was in response to Altucher’s recommendation to author wannabes to consider the route of self-publishing.


Once, self-publishing was only for the wealthy, those not minding to waste their money and the delusional.


These days, it’s a reasonable way to put out a product. Success is limited only by marketing efforts and ingenuity.


Speaking of which, take a look at an 11 year old’s contibution to the theatrical marketing efforts of Option to Profit. We’re still open to suggestions as to who to cast as the protagonist in the film version.


Obviously, having gone that route and increasingly happy with the results, I responded with my own experiences and as is often the case, in an attempt to increase readership of this blog and to spur book sales, I left a link to this site.


Thank you, James.


The response to my comment was:


“Hey AcsMan, just some constructive criticism for your blog. I tried to look around but I couldn’t stand it as it was just too full of google ads and irrelevant tag clouds…”


My initial reaction was, “it’s TheAcsMan. Only my parents call me AcsMan.”


Given that I am a dyed in the wool capitalist, I do use pay per click ads on my blog, but there’s only a single such ad on the home page and two ads on subsequent pages.


Not overly obtrusive or greedy.


Ever since using the ads as a source of revenue, the little waif that I’d taken in for humanitarian purposes, in addition to cheap labor, now gets two helpings of gruel daily.


What caught my attention though was the juxtaposition of the rational offer of constructive criticism together with the emotional comment  “…I couldn’t stand it…”


There was an imbalance in those thoughts that offended the rational portion of my brain and initially made me disinclined to even consider the overall message.


The emotional part of my brain doesn’t take kindly even to constructive criticism, but the essence of the unsolicited observation was correct.


In addition to the Google pay per click ads, a contextual text ad program was loaded a few days prior.


That revenue tool places annoying green underlines all over the text with links to largely irrelevant ads.


He was right. I couldn’t stand it either, but saying so sounded so much more refined coming from me.


It did look cheesey and was very distracting.


My words. Not his.


So the rational part of me removed those links, depite their proven ability to generate revenue and now Little Timmy will die.


As it turned out, the criticism was constructive and I’ve made the bearer an unpaid design consultant. Had the ads remained, I probably would have paid very handsomely.


But that core concept of rational versus emotional carried through to the first trading day of the week.


As writing today’s post, I came across a Tweet from one of my favorites, SellPuts. I’ve mentioned him before. He fits into the category of people that Tweet, yet I have no clue of what is being said, as I know knothing of fundamental chart analysis.


But SellPuts is entertaining and impassioned. I would guess that if you knew anything about technical analysis he would really be worth following, not only on Twitter, but on his website, as well.


Anyway, his 140 space or less piece of rational wisdom was “trade what you see not what you think.”


Perfectly said, although his usual stuff has more emotion attached.


Last week defied rational thought.


This week opened the same, although the rally faded by mid afternoon, as it did on Friday


I was faced with a bundle of cash sitting in my account as 30% of my portfolio was assigned following irrational moves in such holdings as Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Caterpillar and others.


Normally, I can’t sit for more than a few minutes with the cash burning in my pockets.


Despite knowing better I tend to be like a drunken sailor on shore leave and buy everything in sight, even in the face of a rally.


That’s not rational. I know it. I know that there’s a need to “Exercise Restraint to Prevent Premature Speculation,” but again. like all things emotional, it’s harder to do than to say.


Today, though, the rational side seemed to be in place and functioning much better than the portion of me that would be afraid of letting a rally slip away from me.


Remember the dangers of falling prey to the FOMO?”


But I was restrained.


I also tried to defer to my rational side in thinking that despite more talk about a melt up, it wasn’t going to happen this week.


So instead of furtively squandering the money, I sold calls a bit more deep in the money than usual in order to lock up some nice premiums, in anticipation of a fade in the underlying stocks.


The same anticipation that proved to be wrong last week.


Now part of that, though, was based a little on envy, since last month was my best ever for generating options premium income and thus far, after 2 weeks, the December cycle is middling.


Envy is a lot like FOMO, but I was really envious of November’s options premiums.


Along the way, I did find the time to buy shares or add to existing positions, but even those saw me sell deeper in the money calls than usual.


I picked up additional shares of Netflix, Mosaic, Sallie Mae and ProShares UltraSilver ETF and quickly sold calls.


I also opened up a sizeable position in Alcoa, despite today’s negative analyst comments and sold a combination of weekly calls and December 2011 calls. The prospect of a 2% premium for a single week appealed to both the emotional and rational brains.


The truly irrational side of me bought shares in Focus Media, to complement the puts that I had previously sold, as Muddy Waters does nothing to erase doubts about its recent activities.


And of course I sold the calls.


Despite the restraint, there still turned out to be too many trades to recount them all, as if you really cared. But if you do, just go to the Portfolio Transaction page.


Going into the last hour of the trading day, the market’s gains were mostly gone and I still had spending money.


Best of all, silver was beginning to look as if it was ready to give up the Ghost, having turned its early day gain around to a substanial loss.


That followed a disappointing week when silver did nothing but climb and I watched my short leveraged ETF fall.


Even worse, I’d prematurely bought back my calls, thereby returning a portion of the rich premiums.


I decided to be a spectator for the final hour.


At that point actual news began filtering in and was ultimately responsible for the reversal of the market’s fortune. WIth all of the component Euro nations being put on credit watch by Standard and Poors, there was less joy in Mudville, but more joy on my La-Z-Boy.


It wasn’t quite like seeing a roadside deer, but I was happy to relax after churning out 24 trades for the day.


What makes me especially happy, if I can delay jury duty for yet another day, is that there may be some bargains to be had tomorrow and I still have cash.


That almost never happens.


The emotional side of me is chomping at the bit at the prospect of actually timing it like that.


The rational side is beginning to warm to the emotions of the moment and is likely to cede all control if the market takes a breather and then some tomorrow


Hell, we may even be able to make .enough to feed Timmy anyway.


Screw those obnoxious green underlined words. We didn’t need them anyway.


And from both sides of my brain, a special thank you to DannyBoy990. 


 




Visits: 11

I Want to Testify






There comes a time in all of our lives when we’ve behaved in one of those really annoying Holier than Thou” kind of ways.


People who do so on a regular basis, and I include myself in that category, come in various shapes, sizes and flavors. The world of faith, that of politics and certainly the world of finance have all seen their fair share of characters espousing the kinds of attitudes that have most people praying for someone to be taken down a notch or two.


Jerry FallwellJerry Fallwell, John Edwards and Bernie Madoff come to mind very quickly.


There are so many more of the one time high flying, but then fallen angels, than I could possibly ever fit into the pages of this blog.


But in America our fallen stars can recover and become rehabilitated so quickly. Probably no  nation in the world practices the concept of foregiveness as well as we do in America.


Either that, or our collective short term memory has taken a really big hit from way too many ganja hits over the years. 


How else do you explain the phenomenon of Newt Gingrich?


Along with the late Henry Hyde (R – Illinois), no two were more vocal and critical of Bill Clinton when his literal and figurative peccaddillloes came to light.


Hyde trumped them all by having a ‘baby momma” hidden from the public’s views for all those years, although Gingrich wasn’t far behind.


Gandhi was reported to have said “I like your Christ, but I do not like your Christians.”


Of course, these days, that quote would be artisitically toyed with a bit by the likes of Jon Stewart to something like “I like Christ, but Christians? Eh, not so much.”


He then would be castigated by someone who shouldn’t be throwing stones from inside a glass broadcast booth (On FOX).


But I stray.


As always, this is about me.


I feel a need to testify as I’ve been moved by the spirit.


At least the spirit in the profits I may have left on the table this past week.


Admittedly, last week didn’t turn out that badly for me. While the S&P 500 was up by 7.4%, I lagged by only 0.2%, having had a good day on Friday, when the market gave all 150 points back.


But it was more of a case of what could have been.


Over the years I’d been fairly immune from making stupid trades. Especially the kind that I describing as picking crumbs, when I try to squeeze out any last bits of option sale related income.


But not this week.


And I feel a need to cleanse myself and confess my sins. By so doing, I also feel a need to testify in the name of profits.


Not prophets.


Profits.


This past week I started by doubting all thouse dismissing Monday’s 300 point run up as nothing more than a “dead cat bounce.” The chorus was too uniform to be true. The devil’s cacophony always overwhelms the sweetly melodius hymns of the angels in the battle for our souls.


As it turns out, I was right about that, but not right about which way to go when the chorus changed its tune.


By mid-week the chorus was calling for a melt-up in stock prices.


Having no faith in the powers of the voices that be, my sinful self opted to go counter to the wave and sold calls on whatever I could that would be expiring on Friday.


Just an example of my personal greed trying to take advantage of the leveraged greed of call option buyers.


By Wednesday I’d sold calls on Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Caterpillar, Hallliburton and Freeport McMoRan.


For sake of brevity, I’ll leave out those sales for which I have no regrets.


Actually, if I really wanted to be brief I would have done it the other way around, but the backspace button is such an onerous chore.


Of course, those shares that I mentioned just rode the wave and then some.


As the market decided to go with the good employment numbers on Friday and the market took off, I just knew that the wave would ebb.


I also just knew that the meteoric rise in Silver prices would reverse.


So with the confidence that only a “holier than though” trader could muster, I also sold calls on JP Morgan in the firm knowledge that my own brand of faith, that of the wisdom of TheAcsMan, would prevail.


To top it off, I also bought back all of my calls in the ProShares UltraShort Silver ETF, limiting options premium related profits in the supreme confidence that there were even more and bigger premiums in the world to come in a day or so.


But in a blast of truly divine contra-intervention, JP Morgan shares just took off, while the rest of the market began the fade that I so smugly knew would be happening.


Silver?


Oh yeah. It went up some more and in my case, up is bad.


When it was all said and done for the week and the last day of the trading week, I’d won one the battle, but lost the war. Although I had more right decisions and trades than not, it was the one that was not that sent me into reflection.


JP Morgan Chase.


Now, I’m no Gandhi. Lord knows the extra 2 inches necessary in that pair of pants will testify to that, but at least I could reflect.


Holier than thou? Richer than thou? Richer than the me that could have been?


No, maybe and no.


Among the things that I discuss in Option to Profit are the need to dismiss human emotilons of greed and fear. Since then, I’ve also added the need to banish the fear of mssing out.


The sale of last minute calls hoping to capture some extra crumbs worth of premiums is consistent with not being worried about missing out on the kind of totally unexpected gains that could materialize in just a second.


That’s exactly what happened with JP Morgan.


Earlier in the week itr had also happened with Caterpillar, as it went up more than 7% on a day that the Dow went up by just a bit less than 5%.


Now some in the chorus will chant that Caterpillar was unnecssarily beaten fdown in the days before that 490 point gain and that observation would be correct, but it’s certainly not a reason. It’s just an observation, as there were many stocks that were beaten down, but did not bounce back disproportionately.


Jesus wasn’t the only one crucified.


So I lament the loss of Caterpillar, as well, as the heretics exercise their right to take my shares.


But just as Henry Hyde, Tammy Faye Baker and others, the mighty all seem to fall. So too will Caterpillar.


Remember Ozymandias?


Of course you don’t. He never really existed, but Shelley used the mythical Ozymandias to make a point.


Actually, the reason you don’t remember is that no one reads Shelley and Ozymandias was actually another name for the historical Pharoah, Ramses.


But again, that damn backspace. So much easier to go forward than to linger in the past and try to correct those mistakes.


But just as some whose stars fade and never return, Caterpillar will do so and I’ll be there to welcome it back into the stable.


Of course, what would have been much easier and certainly more satisfying would be to use life’s backspace button and “Give me One More Chance.”


In all likelihood, using that backspace option would do nothing, because I wouldn’t have taken profits in my JP Morgan shares, anyway.


Like most investors, it’s easy to say that you need to banish “Greed.” but to do so is really pretty hard.


Ultimately, that’s what really seperates us from the animals. Our inability to learn from our mitakes is distinctive, as usually our mistakes don’t kill us.


We all seem to share the human tendency of not recognizing when it’s time to sell. Instead of selling JP Morgan shares at their peak, most of us will just watch it go back down as it retraces its ascent downward and will then watch it ascend again.


How sad that we keep making the same mistakes. But at least we live to see another day.


That’s what America is about.


Where else can you make the same mistakes, yet rise again, Newt? (Although I do consider him to be an animal.)


As with every Monday, there’s yet another chance to “Do it One More Time” and see whether the deathbed conversion will actually hold.


I’ve seen my personal Profit and Loss statement and I’ve felt the need to cleanse, but damn it, this is America and I get another shot for redemption, as well as another chance to fall and rise and fall again.


Linday Lohan and all of those who ever sang “Give Me One More Chance” would all be envious.


 




Visits: 12