One’s definition of “loss” or “gain” may be a very personal one.
In business courses I had taken while in public health school, there was always an emphasis on “opportunity costs,” and some than 30 years later that concept constantly inserts itself as I look at and measure outcomes.
The “opportunity cost” is a simple concept. It basically asks the question “What did it cost you by not investing in an alternative?” Often, to standardize that question, the alternative investment is selected to represent something of low risk and high liquidity.
You generally don’t prove your point or disprove someone else’s point by selecting a non-standard, or little known alternative or an outlier.
Additionally, you don’t prove your point by selecting a specific or narrow period of time, which itself, may be an outlier.
What prompts my thoughts this week is a disagreement with a reader over a number of tenets of investing in which I believe, had incessantly practiced and had expressed in an article last week, “Re-Thinking Buy and Hold.”
But also, another reader had shared his own experiences with early assignment of “In The Money” call options just prior to the ex-dividend date and that prompted my response in general about dividends and early exercise, but then with specific details of a trade that same week in shares of General Motors (GM).
That purchase of General Motors turned out to be very timely for telling a story.